 |
Minimally Invasive
Kyphoplasty Procedure for an Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression
Fracture:
Live Webcast
September 21, 2005: Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore,
Maryland. Spine surgeons performed a kyphoplasty procedure for osteoporotic
and osteolytic vertebral compression fractures during a live surgery
webcast. The surgery was performed and moderated by A. Jay Khanna,
MD and Mesfin A. Lemma, MD, assistant professors of orthopaedic
surgery at Johns Hopkins Orthopaedics at Good Samaritan Hospital.
The surgeons also answered emailed questions from the web audience.
Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive surgical procedure treating
osteoporotic and osteolytic fractures where a cement-like material
is injected directly into the fractured bone. This stabilizes the
fracture and provides immediate pain relief in many cases. Osteoporosis
is systemic skeletal disease with loss of bone mass, and microarchitectural
deterioration of the bone. Osteolysis is destruction of bone as
a result of multiple myeloma or other tumors.
Approximately 55% of all people over 55 have some degree of osteoporosis.
100 million people in the US are at risk for osteoporosis and 8
million women and 2 million men are diagnosed each year. Many of
these people will go on to experience fractures. As a result of
the fractures many patients show a “humped” back or
kyphosis.
From Dr. Lemma: “We should all treat vertebral fractures as
a serious and growing problem especially in light of our aging population.
It is becoming an epidemic. People don’t realize there are
more vertebral fractures occurring than wrist and hip fractures
combined. More than 750,000 per year in the US alone. Do the math.
That’s one every 24-25 seconds. About a third of those ultimately
fail nonsurgical management and become candidates for fracture repair.
Keep in mind, if you have one compression fracture the risk for
another is increased 5 times. If you have 2 fractures your risk
of a third is 12 fold. These vertebral fractures result in disability,
immobility, diminished quality of life and compromised lung function
if the fractures are in chest region. We need to treat these fractures
even more aggressively than we do hips and wrists.”
Dr. Khanna explained the typical treatment plan for a patient with
vertebral fracture(s). “We always start with a conservative,
non-operative approach. That includes pain control, bracing and
bed rest. But, recent studies indicate bracing causes weak muscles
and bedrest leads to more bone loss. If the patient’s pain
continues then we evaluate surgical repair of the fracture. Before
1997 we had only open spinal repair as a choice. Vertebroplasty
and Kyphoplasty techniques were developed in 1998. This was especially
helpful since most patients with osteoporosis are older and have
lung disease and/or weak bones making them poor risks for open surgery.”
“In a vertebroplasty procedure,” Khanna elaborated,
“the interventionalist inserts a small tube into the pedicle
of the spine and injects surgical cement. That cement has to be
relatively liquid and will follow the path of least resistance.
It should stabilize the spine and thus decrease the pain. The pain
is relieved but research shows the cement can leak into areas where
it is not needed or wanted. In the Kyphoplasty technique we use
the same approach but the cement is more controlled.”
Going live to the interventional radiology suite Khanna introduced
the patient. “This woman is 68 years old. Her MRI shows the
age of the fractures. These appear to be relatively recent. Older
fractures may be less amenable to treatment. She’s had 4 years
of pain. She’s had CAT scans, MRIs and a bone scan—leading
to a diagnosis of multiple lumbar spine fractures. She has failed
maximal medical management.”
Pointing at the patient’s X-ray, Khanna noted, “Here
you see the vertebral body of the spine is a square. The space in
between is the disk space. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
shows no fracture at the 3d lumbar level, but she has wedge fractures
at lumbar spinal levels 1, 2 and 4. These are active fractures and
are quite painful.”
An email from the audience asked: “How long will this procedure
take? Lemma answered, “Each level of the procedure takes about
20 minutes to complete.”
Using biplanar fluoroscopy and general anesthesia and with the patient
in the prone position, Khanna prepped and draped the patient’s
back in the traditional manner. Khanna first approached the L1 level.
Using a lateral fluoro view, Khanna first injected local anesthetic.
“This will provide pain reduction postoperatively,”
he explained. “Now we access the spinal pedicle on the left
side first. I’ve made a 4 mm incision on each side, confirming
that I’m at the correct level with fluoro.” He then
inserted a trocar and cannula into the patient’s back. He
advanced the trocar into the vertebral body through the spinal pedicle
taking care to avoid the spinal canal.
Khanna then took a biopsy of the disk to confirm the myeloma diagnosis.
Next he advanced a drill bit through the cannula into the vertebral
body. Manually turning the drill bit produced a channel through
which he advanced the kyphoplasty balloon. “This specially
designed Kyphoplasty balloon (Kyphon, Sunneyvale, CA) has X-ray
opaque markers to track the position of the balloon. We connect
the proximal end of the balloon’s filling tube to its filling
pump. We can read the amount of fluid and the pressure we are using
to measure how much contrast dye we are moving into balloon.”
Another emailed question: “How long does it take after the
surgery for the patient to fee pain relief? Lemma answered, “Patients
get immediate relief. They go home the same day.”
Khanna then advanced the balloon into vertebral body in the deflated
position. Once it was successfully placed on the right side of the
spine, he duplicated the process on the left side. “Now we
have both balloons in place,” Khanna explained. The balloon
were then inflated pushing dye/contrast into the balloon. “We
are using the balloon to elevate the endplate—the superior
portion of the fracture. We are using a 15 mm balloon to accommodate
the fracture pattern and we’re creating a cavity within the
pedicle to inject the cement and contain it. Our objective is for
height restoration of the vertebra.” The balloon can be sequentially
inflated up to 400 psi (pounds per square inch). “We have
to balance the pressure of balloon and the force of the bone against
it. Here we’re at 200 psi on right side and feeling resistance.”
He then passed a hand curette through the cannula and turned it,
cutting the disk and loosening up the space in the vertebrae. The
balloon was reinserted and inflation continued. Once satisfied with
the cavity created, he removed the balloon.
Bone cement (methyl methacrylate) was then mixed. After a few minutes
the cement reached the appropriate texture of doughiness (where
it doesn’t stick to the surgeon’s glove). Khanna then
injected the cement through a tube into the cavity created by the
kyphoplasty balloon. “The cement hardens and stabilizes the
fracture eliminating the patient’s pain,” Khanna noted.
“It is important that we bring up the height of the endplate
to reduce potential for other fractures.” Working from both
sides, he continued to inject cement until it filled almost the
entire vertebral body.
Dr. Lemma then took over and completed identical treatments to the
remaining fractures. Once all spaces were completed, the skin was
closed traditionally and the wound covered with transparent dressings.
From the audience: “How do your patients react to this procedure?
Khanna said, “Their recovery time is very short. Most patients
wake up with no pain at all. They go home with no restrictions.
Patient satisfaction is extremely high.”
Concluding the presentation and describing the functional outcomes
from Kyphoplasty, Lemma explained, “At the Cleveland Clinic,
we studied 329 patients with 917 levels. The largest experience
we know of. Most of these patients were women. Approximately 25%
had multiple myeloma or other malignancies. Their average age was
69 years and some had fractures as old as 5 years. We found their
vitality greatly improved and their overall functionality greatly
improved. We expect to be able to prove height restoration and we
are beginning to consider other cement substances. We are currently
managing a randomized controlled study. This technique is very safe
and effective.”
|